That being said, looking at nsCSSParser.cpp in Gecko, I just realised you never 
had similar code (printing values when some invariant is broken). Given how old 
Gecko is, I guess that means this is not even useful to begin with (I mean the 
printing you removed was not useful to begin with, just to be extra clear).

I wouldn't mind a tidy thing choking on the slightest appearance of "{:?}" in 
those files.

> Le 13 janv. 2018 à 15:36, Anthony Ramine <n.ox...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> 
> In the PR you link, AFAICT you also removed some uses that were just very 
> small enums or even integers, which may not be necessary.

_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to