On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Nicholas Nethercote <n.netherc...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Xidorn Quan <quanxunz...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Surprisingly, perhaps, there are a lot of people using Firefox on 32-bit >>> Windows. If I’m reading the data correctly, more than half. A small >>> percentage of those don’t have SSE2. >> >> It's not surprising to me. We didn't have Firefox release for Win64 until >> recent, >> and we haven't ever pushed users with 64bit Windows to use that version, > > There are three Windows configurations, AIUI: > > a) 32-bit Firefox on 32-bit Windows > b) 32-bit Firefox on 64-bit Windows > c) 64-bit Firefox on 64-bit Windows > > I think Milan is talking about (a) and Xidorn is talking about (b) vs. (c). > > This discussion will be more productive if everyone is clear about > which configurations they mean. Thanks.
Thanks for making it clear, and sorry for misreading the email. So Milan, did you mean there are over half of people using 32bit Windows not just 32bit Firefox? Is there any data we can see for this? Looked at Telemetry, and found an item called DEVTOOLS_OS_IS_64_BITS_PER_USER, which according to the code, actually checks whether the build is 64bit, not the system. (That checks eventually goes to nsXULAppInfo::GetIs64Bit(), which returns value depends on a compile time macro.) - Xidorn _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
