On 22/12/15 17:22, Andrew Halberstadt wrote:
FWIW a summary of top orangefactor[1] oranges are posted regularly to dev.tree-alerts. Configuring it to also post to dev.platform is certainly possible if that's what people want. Though I have a feeling that people will mostly ignore these emails anyway if we do.
I think previous discussions on this topic have revealed that people mostly ignore those emails if they're not personally actionable. So whilst there are a few people who heroically go through all of the OF top bugs and try to get traction on fixes, we would get much better results from individual mail to developers or teams showing all the top intermittents which they are responsible for.
With that in mind, it's perhaps worth detailing some of the improvements we have in mind for treeherder in 2016:
1) Automatic classification of intermittent failures to help sheriffs on integration trees, and quickly identify failures that are new on try pushes. Potentially, automatic notification when an intermittent increases in frequency,
2) A replacement for Orange Factor, based on the same data as the autoclassification, that will make it easier to present personalised (or, at least path-filtered) lists of top intermittents. These could be posted to specific lists where most subscribers would get fully actionable information.
_______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
