-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi David,
On 10/21/2015 12:13 AM, L. David Baron wrote: > Two W3C Proposed Recommendations are available for the membership > of W3C (including Mozilla) to vote on, before they proceed to the > final stage of being W3C Recomendation: > > HTML Canvas 2D Context http://www.w3.org/TR/2dcontext/ deadline: > October 21, 2015 (tomorrow!) > > W3C DOM4 http://www.w3.org/TR/dom/ deadline: November 3, 2015 > > Both specifications are derived from upstream WHATWG > specifications. > > If there are comments you think Mozilla should send as part of the > review, or if you think Mozilla should voice support or opposition > to the specification, please say so in this thread. (I'd note, > however, that there have been many previous opportunities to make > comments, so it's somewhat bad form to bring up fundamental issues > for the first time at this stage.) > > (Sorry, should have sent these out a bit sooner.) Does this mean that the W3C is claiming that the features in these forks have interoperable implementations, and should we point out what utter nonsense such a claim would be? Thanks Ms2ger -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWJ4O4AAoJEOXgvIL+s8n25y8IAJrdgXFgQOeabi8p9Lix2guQ DuUZT78TaPtRvF1cBbMpcWqzHgcUxYVGyntJWC+4UzJZ0uew8s5ONM3kIKO/VyNh KMKDRtTMxxRn00Y8LOPaLf3UW+Fcv+4Y1beifmlYougJYd0kagSqmNpJEnXcCz97 QUIgl1+8uRyoJwiNxPg0nQJB+oHQ0LPe9kZYFQHEwC1wyyWgDTUZORAJMaRtNXOr CstZ1wcMzmas098g3tSRJgX9bkee+PKXoVxm9t/nNDTlcCDTd+W157xAdFS4uqQW h8rLO7OFAF/wMJtNJ8uuA3W70BiBWOqG5cw2VfxQiKNqmZ0YRBJeQfgISuEkX+I= =iaAo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
