On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 9:26 PM, <zbranie...@mozilla.com> wrote: > On Saturday, October 10, 2015 at 4:28:30 AM UTC-7, Mounir Lamouri wrote: >> On Sat, 10 Oct 2015, at 02:02, zbranie...@mozilla.com wrote: >> > On Friday, October 9, 2015 at 10:51:54 AM UTC-7, Mounir Lamouri wrote: >> > > As far as speed feeling goes, they would win to show something as soon >> > > as possible and handle any post-first paint loading themselves. >> > >> > That is unfortunately not consistent with my experience. People tend to >> > perceive visible progressive as much slower than delayed first-paint in >> > most scenarios. >> > >> > On top of that, it is perceived as a really_bad_ux. >> >> I don't think I agree but I don't mean to discuss Firefox OS product >> decisions. > > I don't think it's specific to Firefox OS. FOUC is a pretty well researched > problem and we have spent a lot of time designing standards to limit the risk > of them happening. > > The problem is that all we take into account when building anti-FOUC > heuristics is HTML+CSS, while in the modern Web Apps, JS is part of the > bootstrap process.
I agree with a lot of the above. I would recommend reaching out to Martin Best and getting this on his backlog of items that we need in order to create more beautiful webapps. / Jonas _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform