On Thursday 2015-06-11 11:13 -0700, Steve Fink wrote: > If I were to handwave up a new mechanism to replace bug comments + voting, > I'd probably want a feature/bug page with > > - upvote/downvote counts (3 vs 100 is useful information, even if it > doesn't decide anything on its own) > - list of *distinct* reasons for wanting it > - counterarguments and data (eg web compat info) > - pointer to the appropriate discussion forum and threads
For what it's worth, I'd pay more attention to votes if I could see the graph of how vote counts changed over time. I'd be much more inclined to believe votes that have increased steadily over time (from people independently deciding that something was important) than votes that increased in big jumps (because one person decided that it was important and did a good job of convincing others to vote for the bug). I have occasionally looked at the list of most-voted-for bugs to see if there were important things to prioritize that we were forgetting about, but it's probably been a few years since I've done so. -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know What I was walling in or walling out, And to whom I was like to give offense. - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
