On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Gabor Krizsanits <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think I'm not the only one experienced issues with reviews from one side > or the other. > I'm wondering if we could do some improvements here for everyone's sake. > > Here are the issues the way I see it: > * some parts of the code need more peers > - we should identify the areas > - we should select candidates > - there should be a clear path to become a peer > (reading up code/spec, asking for sr's first and starting with easier > ones, etc) > Identify some areas. :) > * reviews are not part of our goal system > - it makes no sense to work on something if for the > reviewer will likely take several weeks or even months > to get to the review (for various but foreseeable reasons) > - people who are flooded with reviews cannot focus on their > actual goals they signed up for, or have to block people by > not doing reviews > Not sure this is the best forum for this, since this is really a MoCo-internal thing, but people should be setting goals that still allow time to do reviews, critical bug fixes, etc. This quarter is probably a little rough because the process is different, but I would expect that to stabilize over time. - Kyle _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
