I think I'm not the only one experienced issues with reviews from one side
or the other.
I'm wondering if we could do some improvements here for everyone's sake.
Here are the issues the way I see it:
* some parts of the code need more peers
- we should identify the areas
- we should select candidates
- there should be a clear path to become a peer
(reading up code/spec, asking for sr's first and starting with easier
ones, etc)
* reviews are not part of our goal system
- it makes no sense to work on something if for the
reviewer will likely take several weeks or even months
to get to the review (for various but foreseeable reasons)
- people who are flooded with reviews cannot focus on their
actual goals they signed up for, or have to block people by
not doing reviews
Maybe I'm just not well informed, and all these issues are already being
taken care of... But if not, I would like to hear what others think.
- Gabor
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
