On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 3:28 AM, Kyle Huey <m...@kylehuey.com> wrote: > Do we have actual evidence that indexeddb performance is a problem? I've > never seen any.
Yup. I think this is a very good question. Did the people writing https://wiki.mozilla.org/Performance/Avoid_SQLite_In_Your_Next_Firefox_Feature gather any data to substantiate the complaints about IndexedDB? Or is the performance problems inherent due to using SQLite? If so, it would be good to understand why. / Jonas > > - Kyle > On Feb 1, 2015 3:45 PM, "Fabrice Desré" <fabr...@mozilla.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 20:05:46 +0800, Philip Chee wrote: >> >> > On 31/01/2015 14:03, Vladan Djeric wrote: >> >> We do need a performant key-value store implementation. This has been >> >> discussed before and various people have come up with proposals (myself >> >> included), but no one has had the time & focus to see it through to the >> >> end :/ >> >> I suspect part of the problem is that different use cases (IndexedDB >> >> re-implementation, prefs, simple storage, etc) have different >> >> requirements so no single solution satisfies everyone. I doubt I'll >> >> have time in Q1 but this is definitely something I want to do, or help >> >> out with, if some one else would like to step up. >> > >> > Are we going to roll our own or use an existing OSS implementation like >> > SQLite4 or LMDB? >> >> It was decided 2,5 years ago to not use LevelDB (https:// >> bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=leveldb). Maybe it's time to revisit >> this decision? >> >> Fabrice >> _______________________________________________ >> dev-platform mailing list >> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org >> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform >> > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
