We do need a performant key-value store implementation. This has been discussed before and various people have come up with proposals (myself included), but no one has had the time & focus to see it through to the end :/ I suspect part of the problem is that different use cases (IndexedDB re-implementation, prefs, simple storage, etc) have different requirements so no single solution satisfies everyone. I doubt I'll have time in Q1 but this is definitely something I want to do, or help out with, if some one else would like to step up.
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Gabriele Svelto <gsve...@mozilla.com> wrote: > On 30/01/2015 08:45, Jonas Sicking wrote: >> However, it would be cool if we fixed our IndexedDB implementation >> rather than told our own developers not to use it. Web developers are >> not so lucky as to have other options. > > Yeah and we're making some pretty heavy use of it within Firefox OS. > I've spent some time trying to reduce its memory footprint (e.g. > including sending PRAGMA shrink_memory commands when low on memory or > when an app is sent to the background) but we really have no way around > using it. Any optimization effort for small & very small databases would > be very welcome as those are rather common AFAIK. > > Gabriele > _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
