On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Steve Fink <sf...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> But that's not the point. I totally agree that non-unified builds will > get broken immediately and will stay broken most of the time. That's not > in question. The point is how hard it is for someone who comes along and > wants to fix our codebase to be valid C++, even if that fix is not > permanent. Why would that even be a goal? If the project builds, is that not sufficient? I don't see any value in some platonic "correctness". _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
