Le mardi 14 octobre 2014 14:29:04 UTC+2, Boris Zbarsky a écrit : > On 10/13/14, 11:28 PM, Yonggang Luo wrote: > > > If the XUL is truly dead, then mozilla community should consider to remove > > it totally from the codebase > > > > Working on it. It's a big project. ;)
Seriously ?!? Guys, you understand there is an ecosystem - even if it is a small one - of companies relying on XUL for their businesses? BlueGriffon, Postbox and more rely on XUL and XULRunner. So I have two questions: 1. does Mozilla still care about us? I have endlessly tried to discuss the fate of XUL and XULRunner with a previous Mozilla CEO, Gary Kovacs. He _never_ accepted to have a chat about it. I have the feeling we are left outside alone in a « too bad for you » move and I find it depressing. 2. since it's out of question to rebuild something as big as the UI of BlueGriffon or Postbox in html (and that will imply rewriting most of the js around) for the time being, what do you suggest? I would like to have a response from - or some direct interaction with - Chris Beard please. Putting XUL to rest would be a death knell on a critically-large part of my business - among others - and I think it deserves a bit more than a technical discussion or one-liners with a smiley. In short, it would kill my company. Long-time partners heavily relying on XUL deserve a bit more than the current ultralight information we have. Thanks. </Daniel> _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
