Hi Jet, The patch to turn CSS filters on is tripping over a filters parsing test on the B2G try bot. I added more details on the bug. It seems like a silly problem, but Iβm not sure whatβs going on yet. Maybe dbaron has seen something like this before? Otherwise, Iβm trying to set up a B2G build to repro the problem.
Thanks, Max On Oct 1, 2014, at 2:07 PM, Jet Villegas <j...@mozilla.com> wrote: > I see the r+ on https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1057180 > > Are we missing anything else to checkin+ and turn this on? > > --Jet > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Max Vujovic" <mvujo...@adobe.com> > To: "Dirk Schulze" <dschu...@adobe.com> > Cc: "Jacob Goldstein" <jac...@adobe.com>, "L. David Baron" > <dba...@dbaron.org>, "Rik Cabanier" <caban...@adobe.com>, "Rik Cabanier" > <caban...@gmail.com>, dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 11:27:19 AM > Subject: Re: Intent to ship: CSS Filters > > On Sep 16, 2014, at 9:52 PM, Dirk Schulze <dschu...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> >> >>> On Sep 17, 2014, at 2:44 AM, "L. David Baron" <dba...@dbaron.org> wrote: >>> >>>> On Tuesday 2014-09-16 16:31 -0700, Rik Cabanier wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 2:44 PM, L. David Baron <dba...@dbaron.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Tuesday 2014-09-16 21:29 +0000, Max Vujovic wrote: >>>>>> == Interop == >>>>>> Safari, Chrome, and Opera currently ship an interoperable implementation >>>>> of CSS Filters behind a -webkit prefix. >>>>> >>>>> Do they have plans to ship without the prefix? It's not really >>>>> interoperable if it requires different syntax. >>>> >>>> Are you suggesting that we should add a '-webkit-filter' property so >>>> Firefox is interoperable? >>> >>> No. I'm suggesting that we should try to ensure that Blink and >>> WebKit unprefix sooner rather than later. >> >> Shorthand filters are just supported on HTML content in WebKit and Blink. >> SVG content exclusively works with the unprefixed filter property which >> currently just supports a reference to SVG <filter> elements. Once that is >> fixed, both platforms will support the shorthand functions on unprefixed >> filter as well. However, it is unlikely that the prefixed property will be >> removed soon. Shipping CSS filters in Firefox is a strong signal to web >> developers. The specification is getting finalized and changes to the >> existing functions must be compatible to the current implementation in >> WebKit, Blink and Gecko and will not be accepted for level 1 of the spec. > > Thanks for the info, Dirk. I just asked the question on webkit-dev [1] and > blink-dev [2], which might surface other blockers in those projects. At the > least, I hope it draws some attention to shipping an unprefixed version. > > [1]: https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/2014-September/026871.html > [2]: > https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!topic/blink-dev/R2gCfHjNgKs > > - Max > >> >> Greetings >> Dirk >> >> >>> >>> -David >>> >>> -- >>> π L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ π >>> π’ Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ π >>> Before I built a wall I'd ask to know >>> What I was walling in or walling out, >>> And to whom I was like to give offense. >>> - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914) > > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
