On Sep 16, 2014, at 2:44 PM, L. David Baron <dba...@dbaron.org> wrote:
> On Tuesday 2014-09-16 21:29 +0000, Max Vujovic wrote: >> == Interop == >> Safari, Chrome, and Opera currently ship an interoperable implementation of >> CSS Filters behind a -webkit prefix. > > Do they have plans to ship without the prefix? It's not really > interoperable if it requires different syntax. I’m sure they plan to ship unprefixed at some point. I'll ask on webkit-dev and blink-dev about what they need to get there. The syntax is interoperable after the property name, at least. If we ship CSS Filters, we’ll see code like this: -webkit-filter: blur(3px); filter: blur(3px); And I’m thinking many web developers will be using an automated prefixing solution and simply writing: filter: blur(3px); Unfortunately, many of the CSS Filters examples I see on the web today are using the -webkit prefix exclusively: -webkit-filter: blur(3px); I’m hoping that Firefox shipping unprefixed will help break that habit. - Max > > -David > > -- > 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 > 𝄢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂 > Before I built a wall I'd ask to know > What I was walling in or walling out, > And to whom I was like to give offense. > - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914) _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
