Do either of you have reasoning for that other than "it looks better to me"? I personally think consistency trumps any personal preferences based on length/concision, as long as what we end up with isn't unreasonably long/verbose.
Gavin On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbar...@mit.edu> wrote: > >> On 6/2/14, 3:34 PM, Paolo Amadini wrote: >> >>> It seems to me that if we don't have external compatibility needs, we >>> might as well move mochitests to use a set of assertion methods that is >>> the same as xpcshell and maybe other test suites. >>> >> >> Yes, but imho we should be moving xpcshell in the direction of the ok/is >> bits that mochitests use instead of moving mochitests in the direction of >> longer function names. >> > > Yes, this was precisely my point. > > -- > Ehsan > <http://ehsanakhgari.org/> > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
