On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbar...@mit.edu> wrote:
> On 6/2/14, 3:34 PM, Paolo Amadini wrote: > >> It seems to me that if we don't have external compatibility needs, we >> might as well move mochitests to use a set of assertion methods that is >> the same as xpcshell and maybe other test suites. >> > > Yes, but imho we should be moving xpcshell in the direction of the ok/is > bits that mochitests use instead of moving mochitests in the direction of > longer function names. > Yes, this was precisely my point. -- Ehsan <http://ehsanakhgari.org/> _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
