On 2014-05-30, at 21:00, Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2x3 matrices > representing affine 2D transformations; this mode switch corresponds to the > is2D() getter Am I the only one that finds this method entirely unintuitive? After looking at only the IDL, admittedly, is2D() === true. Is the name intended to convey the fact that this is a highly specialised matrix, because it doesn’t really do that for me. _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
