Thanks for adding me Anne, you did get my email correct :-). Personally, I'm not interested in developing TTML. I still agree to all the points from our previous discussion from the page you linked, Anne.
I'm not really sure whether having a joint working group would be of benefit, particularly if there isn't interest in developing TTML in the WebVTT community, which from my experience is the case. It also scares me a bit because having a joint group might result in WebVTT being modified for TTML specific reasons, such as better interoperability, or otherwise, (possibly?) which wouldn't be good for the spec moving forward due to our previous concerns. Rick On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Anne van Kesteren <ann...@annevk.nl> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:56 AM, L. David Baron <dba...@dbaron.org> wrote: > > The W3C is proposing a revised charter for: > > > > Timed Text Working Group > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2014Feb/0004.html > > http://www.w3.org/2013/10/timed-text-charter.html > > deadline for comments: March 20 > > > > This new charter is quite substantive, in that it recharters a > > working group that was previously only for TTML to now be to develop > > both TTML and WebVTT. My understanding is that the two halves of > > the group are expected to operate somewhat separately but also > > interact, although the charter doesn't seem to say that explicitly. > > > > Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objections through > > March 20. Please reply to this thread if you think there's > > something we should say. > > So we commented pretty strongly against this in the past: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2013May/0034.html > > Has something changed? > > > (Not sure I got the correct email address for Rick, I found it on old > archived email from a year ago.) > > > -- > http://annevankesteren.nl/ > _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
