Thanks Andrew, much appreciated. You can make the changes yourself, or provide me with a list of stuff to delete/change. I am happy with either. You might find it quicker to just chop out the stuff to be deleted, rather than mailing me with it all, but it’s up to you.
Best, Chris On 14 Feb 2014, at 15:21, Andrew Halberstadt <ahalberst...@mozilla.com> wrote: > Hey Chris, I can do a review. Though fair warning, I wrote most of it :). It > looks like it's still accurate, though I would probably delete everything > other than how to run them using mach. I don't think there is any reason to > support the old manual way of doing it anymore. > > Let me know what you need me to do. > > Andrew > > On 14/02/14 04:32 AM, Chris Mills wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I’m currently going through all of the automation/testing articles on the >> Firefox OS zone on MDN[1], and I’m hunting for someone who knows a lot about >> Reftests, to give the FxOS reftests article[2] a review and let me know if >> it makes sense. >> >> Let me know if you are willing to do this, and I will be eternally grateful >> ;-) >> >> Chris Mills >> Senior tech writer || Mozilla >> developer.mozilla.org || MDN >> cmi...@mozilla.com || @chrisdavidmills >> >> >> [1] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Firefox_OS/Platform/Automated_testing >> [2] >> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Firefox_OS/Platform/Automated_testing/Reftests >> > > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
