I have a couple concerns. 1. It makes it much more difficult to ship a site specific browser that can be installed alongside Firefox (especially if that browser might need to be different than the installed Firefox, like based on the ESR). It would seem that the best method would be to take a firefox install, remove any bits that are "Firefox" and install that. I'm not sure legal would like that.
2. It creates licensing issues. Previously, we would ship XULRunner and there were no Firefox trademarks involved. If we are shipping actual Firefox with modifications for our application, I would assume it would have to go through Firefox legal. I think the stub to launch the app is a must have. I do not want to ship firefox.exe to customer that need a site specific browser and create an icon that launches firefox with -app. I need to be able to deliver them a named EXE just like any other application. _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
