On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 05:54:12PM -0800, Jesse Ruderman wrote: > In the long run, it may be more efficient to use the clang "sanitizer" > suite instead of Valgrind. It will need two runs (ASan+LSan+UBSan and > MSan) but the total run time should be lower. > > http://clang.llvm.org/docs/UsersManual.html#controlling-code-generation
ASan, LSan, UBSan, MSan, all of these are very useful to catch coding errors. But valgrind also goes further, by running unmodified release builds: it can catch errors introduced by the compiler itself. Mike _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
