On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 08:15:29PM -0700, Brian Smith wrote: > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > On 2013-08-08 11:34 AM, Brian Smith wrote: > > > >> My position is that we should fix STLPort's implementation > >> for GCC 4.4 ARM Linux (maybe just backport a fixed version) and use > >> std::type_traits everywhere. > >> > >> Now that I know we can modify our STLport as needed, I do agree that it > > is preferred to fix that and use std::type_traits instead. At that time, I > > did not have that knowledge. And we want to move on from gcc 4.4. for > > other reasons anyway, so perhaps there isn't anything that we disagree on. > > > Great. I actually didn't know about the STLPort stuff either when this > conversation started. > > One final thing: Will an upgrade from GCC 4.4 to GCC 4.7 reduce or > eliminate the need for us to use STLPort? Is there any documentation on > what causes us to depend on STLPort? My guess is that soon STLPort, and not > GCC or clang or MSVC limitations, is what is going to be slowing us down, > so perhaps we should have a plan for getting rid of the need for it.
Building with libstdc++ on android simply doesn't work at the moment. It also used to produce significantly bigger packages when it used to work. Mike _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
