On 17/06/13 21:48, Drew Willcoxon wrote: > Toolkit already has a thumbnail module, [PageThumbs], but it can only > capture thumbnails of open content windows, same as they appear to > the user. Windows may contain sensitive data that should not be > recorded in an image, however, like bank account numbers and so on, > so Firefox uses some [heuristics] to determine when it's safe to > capture a given window.
Can I challenge an assumption here? I'm not sure I know of a website which puts up sensitive data large enough that it would show up on a thumbnail. And even if it did, it's my browser on my machine. Do we have actual examples of where a thumbnail becomes dangerous? Could we consider using blurring, or just using the favicon, instead of this seemingly highly complicated parallel request infrastructure? Gerv _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
