On Tuesday 2012-08-28 11:17 -0700, L. David Baron wrote: > On Tuesday 2012-08-28 12:52 -0400, Andrew Halberstadt wrote: > > == The Problem == > > > > Reftests currently assume a window size of 800x1000. This is not > > possible on mobile devices, and using this resolution on tegras and > > pandas consumes too much memory and results in many timeouts and > > random-failures. > > > > Changing the resolution to something like 400x400 is very stable and > > only results in a handful of failures. The problem is it's difficult > > to figure out how many tests are false positives as a result of lost > > coverage. > > I don't think it's that difficult; it does require a decent amount > of manual labor (looking at test images for each test, but very > quickly), but I don't think it's that huge. (It probably requires a > half-second look at each test image; note that there are fewer > unique test images than there are tests.)
Er, sorry, you probably want to look at the 800x1000 test image side-by-side with the smaller size test image. That's probably more like a second per set of images in the normal case. -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂 _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
