Quoting Dag-Erling Smørgrav <d...@freebsd.org> (from Thu, 09 Feb 2023 10:46:49 +0100):

Alexander Leidinger <alexan...@leidinger.net> writes:
You change from "no fork+exec if the file doesn't exist" (due to "if"
and "[" being shell-builtins) to "always fork+exec". On fast machines
surely not an issue, on slow ones, it may make a difference (I have an
old amd64 machine at an ISP which takes days to do a buildworld with
-j2 due to not much memory, only 2 cores, old HDs, and other stuff
going on in parallel).

Have you measured this?  Because the whole point of clean_dep() is that

No, I haven't measured, for this reason I used "may".

the file it looks for nearly always exists.  It's the grep we're not
sure of.  So checking if the file exists is nearly always a waste.

Thanks for clarifying that.

While the .depend.* namespace is surely controlled by us, would it
make sense to change the glob to ".{o,pico}" instead of ".*o" instead
to prevent unexpected surprises in the future?

Our sh does not support the {} syntax.  Besides, what would it change?
What else would match .*o but not .{o,pico}?

My point here is, that making this more specific (we can also list the files explicitely), we _maybe_ can prevent foot-shooting in the _future_, in case there is something else added. I've seen enough cases where wildcarded removals caused harm after a little change in some other place. I have no doubts that you checked that this _currently_ is working fine. Based upon my experience in troubleshooting issues with "lost files" after an innocent change somewhere else, I prefer to at least ask about it.

Bye,
Alexander.

--
http://www.Leidinger.net alexan...@leidinger.net: PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF
http://www.FreeBSD.org    netch...@freebsd.org  : PGP 0x8F31830F9F2772BF

Attachment: pgpVgO_3zVeBo.pgp
Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur

Reply via email to