Sanford Whiteman wrote:
Unlike...  um,  anyone on this list, it seems... I know firsthand what
SEC and NASD think of homegrown "compliance" solutions.
That's why you pay someone else to do it and insist that they slap on a fancy name like "Perfect Super Uber E-mail Compliance Archive System".

But seriously, the baseline test is whether or not it works, and no one should invest in something that doesn't meet regulations.

I do have some experience with the feds, and I did work for a multi-billion dollar corporation where my immediate boss was in charge of E-mail for the entire company, and we were always being sued by someone. That was pre-SOX though, but we all knew it was coming and that it mostly just clarified retention policies by better defining what was classified as a covered communication. I also have a good friend deals with bank audits on a regular basis as well as SOX compliance. When audited, they will always point a list of things out, and they can find fault with anything that they choose to find fault with. The real trick is ensuring that you aren't grossly negligent.

Also note that congress didn't even specify retention periods within SOX or methods of retention, this was all inferred after the fact by combining aspects of various laws and regulations, and they certainly didn't endorse a particular product for providing a solution.

With all of that said, I believe that what one does should be compatible with the dynamics of one's business. For a single location entity with less than 200 employees, clearly a less robust solution could manage the task, and it could be home grown. Those that have many more employees and multiple locations would likely find a commercial solution more beneficial overall. There are even situations with multi-national companies where it is pretty much impossible to be in compliance with every regulation that applies to them. For instance, some countries require removing certain records for privacy, while others require retaining all such records for oversight and legal reasons.

Matt


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Reply via email to