Actually, those variable codes are listed at the bottom of the online manual.
Dean
On 4/4/06, Scott Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I doubt you'll get a list. I imagine this is proprietary information for
Declude.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 7:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMHEADERS question - more confusion
> David,
>
> Pardon the delayed reply, but I'm curious, how many possible codes are
> there and is there a comprehensive inventory or list anywhere?
>
> Thanks,
> Dan
>
>
>
> On Feb 24, 2006, at 5:56, David Barker wrote:
>
>> You can add the following to your global.cfg file under your headers
>> section:
>>
>> XINHEADER X-Declude-Code: %HEADERCODE%
>>
>> This will produce a code and you can check it on this web page which
>> will
>> explain to you what problem(s) exist with headers that cause E- mails to
>> fail
>> the BADHEADERS or SPAMHEADERS tests in Declude JunkMail.
>>
>> http://www.declude.com/tools/header.php
>>
>> David B
>> www.declude.com
>> ________________________________
>>
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Orin Wells
>> Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 3:05 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAMHEADERS question - more confusion
>>
>>
>> Thanks Matt. I don't spend as much time as some of you folks have spent
>> on
>> both iMail and Declude so there is more than a little bit I still have
>> to
>> learn.
>>
>> I misread your first response and got off on the wrong track by thinking
>> you
>> had said the message-id header WAS inserted by the mail client. In
>> re-reading you clearly said it was done by iMail. OK, I know what to do
>> now.
>>
>> At 10:47 PM 2/23/2006, Matt wrote:
>>
>>
>> Outlook does not add a Message-ID header. The difference between
>> these two messages is that the first is one that is using your server as
>> it's SMTP server and you are scanning the message as it came directly
>> from
>> the E-mail client, while the second example is one that passed through
>> another server before coming to yours. IMail, like most every E-mail
>> server, adds a Message-ID header when one isn't already there. Declude
>> detects Message-ID headers inserted by your own IMail box (Message-Id:
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in the first example), and treats the
>> message as if it didn't have one since it didn't actually have one when
>> it
>> was received, and this is what triggers SPAMHEADERS for this message.
>> The
>> second example had a Message-ID header before it hit your server. That
>> header was inserted by Charter's server.
>>
>> There is a lesser known solution to this that you definitely should
>> add if you are going to stay on IMail 7.07. You can add
>> "LOOSENSPAMHEADERS
>> ON" to your Global.cfg to disable the Message-ID test in SPAMHEADERS. I
>> use
>> this even though I don't have the same issue because I get a lot more
>> false
>> positives on SPAMHEADERS when it checks for the Message-ID. If you use
>> this
>> alternative switch, you will still get other hits such as CMDSPACE and
>> BADHEADERS on some of the same E-mail clients. It appears that you
>> aren't
>> using CMDSPACE though because that test would hit every directly
>> connecting
>> Outlook client unless it was whitelisted. CMDSPACE is a great test,
>> especially in combination with other tests that target zombie spam
>> (XBL/CBL,
>> SpamCop, open relay tests, and to some extent Sniffer).
>>
>> The best solution is to upgrade to IMail 8.x or higher and add a
>> setting to your Global.cfg for "WHITELIST AUTH". This will whitelist
>> all
>> authenticated E-mail, which I assume included the first example that you
>> provided. This also saves processing power since WHITELIST AUTH
>> disables
>> most tests in JunkMail.
>>
>> Matt
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Orin Wells wrote:
>>
>> Clearly I am missing something here. I am still wrestling
>> with the SPAMHEADERS issue but with a different sender. This time the
>> sender is using Microsoft Office Outlook. It appears messages coming
>> from
>> this sender do not have the Message-ID header. But when I look at other
>> messages sent by others using the same build of this application
>> sometimes
>> they DO have the Message-ID. What is happening here? Is there anyway
>> that
>> this sender can "fix" this problem?
>>
>> Here is a header set from the chap who is "failing"
>>
>> X-Persona: <Awasco>
>> Received: from steve2 [ 216.254.57.135] by consejo-wa.org
>> with ESMTP
>> (SMTPD32-7.07) id A9111EEB010C; Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:37:05
>> -0800
>> Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> From: "Steve Chupik" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "'Orin Wells'" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: RE: e-mail
>> Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:36:49 -0800
>> Organization: Consejo Counseling
>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>>
>> boundary="----=_NextPart_000_03BE_01C63886.9616AF40"
>> X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
>> Thread-Index: AcYzhon3oAG4QKXrR/aQjfBQ4RaA6gFQvMdQ
>> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506
>> In-Reply-To: < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
>> X-RBL-Warning: SPAMHEADERS: This E-mail has headers
>> consistent with spam [4000021e].
>> X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ 216.254.57.135]
>> X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by Declude JunkMail
>> (www.declude.com <http://www.declude.com/> ) for spam.
>> X-Spam-Tests-Failed: SPAMHEADERS
>> X-RCPT-TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
>> Status: U
>> X-UIDL: 375162615
>>
>> Here is a message from another chap using exactly the same
>> build of MS Office Outlook - no problem.
>>
>> X-Persona: <Awasco>
>> Received: from mxsf16.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.216]
>> by awasco.com with ESMTP
>> (SMTPD32-7.07) id A0DE7401B8; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 08:18:54
>> -0700
>> Received: from mxip10.cluster1.charter.net
>> ( mxip10a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.140])
>> by mxsf16.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11/8.12.11)
>> with ESMTP id i6QF6YR0023700
>> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:06:34 -0400
>> Received: from 44ba00138.kfalls.or.charter.com (HELO
>> SCOTTSGATEWAY) (68.186.0.138)
>> by mxip10.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 26 Jul 2004
>> 11:06:32 -0400
>> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> X-Ironport-AV: i="3.83,88,1089000000";
>> d="scan'208?jpg'208,145?dat'208,145,59";
>> a="140519816:sNHT19421620"
>> Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> From: "Scott Lochard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "Orin Wells" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
>> Subject:
>> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 08:06:30 -0700
>> Organization: LifeorDeathLeadership
>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>> Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
>>
>> boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0060_01C472E7.76D7EA10"
>> X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
>> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
>> X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
>> 00000000E4E4AE15AD8AD544BD6C22CBC36DF311E4922700
>> Thread-Index: AcRzIeZrtdYsyWeMTb6K4XIb1GNwxA==
>> X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [209.225.28.216 ]
>> X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by Declude JunkMail
>> (www.declude.com <http://www.declude.com/> ) for spam.
>> X-Spam-Tests-Failed: IPNOTINMX, CATCHALLMAILS
>> X-Declude-Date: 07/26/2004 15:06:30 [12]
>> X-RCPT-TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Status: U
>> X-UIDL: 375108670
>>
>> Is it the ISP service that inserts (or should) the
>> message-ID or is it Outlook? It does not make sense it would be the ISP
>> service because it really shouldn't even know you are sending an email.
>> So
>> if it is the email client application (Microsoft Office Outlook) why
>> does
>> one incarnation insert the message header and the other not?
>>
>> I am not convinced that it is necessarily the message-id
>> because I found a message from Barry Simpson using an even later version
>> of
>> Microsoft Office Outlook where the message-id appears in the same manner
>> and
>> no flag is generated. Now I am really confused. Is it something else
>> causing this failure?
>>
>> X-Persona: <Awasco>
>> Received: from declude.com [63.246.13.90] by awasco.com with
>> ESMTP
>> (SMTPD32-7.07) id A421B009E; Thu, 02 Dec 2004 07:26:25
>> -0800
>> Received: from Bart [68.162.218.198] by declude.com with
>> ESMTP
>> (SMTPD32-8.05) id AB311FD40074; Thu, 02 Dec 2004 08:40:01
>> -0500
>> Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> From: "Barry Simpson" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Important Declude Update
>> Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 08:43:34 -0500
>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>>
>> boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0034_01C4D84B.02BCA200"
>> X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353
>> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
>> Thread-Index: AcTYdOsB2FXQiyGFTg2powYSHhcaCQ==
>> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> X-ML1: NzI5
>> X-ML2: VGh1LCAyIERlYyAyMDA0IDA4OjQzOjM0IC0wNTAw
>> X-ML3:
>> QY969WtqWWSEQlARpEoFHITI4imZ2xl74aRUjTv/smaG5axEQub2RD
>> +vbSwB4HRHiUzm78WolzKZ
>> y7Tdee3Fig==
>> X-Note: This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
>> (www.declude.com <http://www.declude.com/> )
>> X-NRecips: 1
>> X-Reverse-IP: static-68-162-218-198.bos.east.verizon.net
>> X-Weight: 0 (Whitelisted)
>> X-Country-Chain: UNITED STATES->destination.
>> X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [68.162.218.198]
>> X-Declude-Spoolname: D1b311fd40074adf7.SMD
>> Precedence: bulk
>> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [63.246.13.90]
>> X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by Declude JunkMail
>> (www.declude.com <http://www.declude.com/> ) for spam.
>> X-Spam-Tests-Failed: CATCHALLMAILS
>> X-Declude-Date: 12/02/2004 13:43:34 [102]
>> X-RCPT-TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Status: U
>> X-UIDL: 375122650
>>
>> --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA
>> www.declude.com] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing
>> list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
>> type
>> "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at
>> http://www.mail-archive.com .
>>
>> --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA
>> www.declude.com] ---
>> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe,
>> just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe
>> Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-
>> archive.com.
>>
>>
>> ---
>> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
>>
>> ---
>> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
>> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
>> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
>> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
>
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
>
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
--
__________________________________________
Dean Lawrence, CIO/Partner
Internet Data Technology
888.GET.IDT1 ext. 701 * fax: 888.438.4381
http://www.idatatech.com/
Corporate Internet Development and Marketing Specialists
