That could end up being one of the better tests. Thanks. > -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Landry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 1:09 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Fwd: Verisign's New Change and Outdate > RBL's > > > Yep, that's correct, and probably not a good thing. I have > been using an > rhsbl test, and it appears to be doing what it should--that > is, query DNS > with the return address and if it comes back with > 64.94.110.11, add weight > to the message. Here is what I am using: > > VERISCAM rhsbl . 64.94.110.11 1 0 > > Yes, that's a period "." where you would normally list the > rhsbl lookup > domain. This has the effect of JunkMail doing an "A" record > lookup against > your own DNS for the return address listed in the message, > and if it is an > invalid domain, the DNS returns with 64.94.110.11, which > causes the message > to fail the VERISCAM test and weight gets added to the > message. I've set > the weight to 1 for testing, but so far messages that have > gotten flagged by > the VERISCAM test have been spam. >
--- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
