Hi everyone, New user to JunkMail here..
I know that declude has a spam trap. Is there data available on this to determine how effective each test is? I am very interested in expanding our definitions from the current defaults, but before i can do that, i kinda would like to see how the each test compares at a bigger sampling.. Or is everyone going on different pathways... Also, how can i create a spam trap, to evaluate how effective each test is to properly setup each weights. e.g. Is there a test that is 100% effective in identifying spam like helobogus, but many spam can bypass this. This way this test is tier one. If a spam fails this, go no further and delete. If helobogus is okay, then apply test 2, etc... I know this is very linear, but without any data on the effectiveness of each test, customizing the defs is gonna be purely trial and error, which I so want to limit.. I dont know... What you you all recommend on how new users should approach to building a better and efficient definitions... Is there a tool available that will read the junkmail logs and break down each test as to their effectiveness? Sincerely, eddie. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
