On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 05:02:53PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 06:43:10PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > > Does XTerm #196, in xterm 4.3.0.dfsg.1-8, make either of these any better? > > > > I can still reproduce the problem in mutt using the uxterm binary from that > > package. > > > > e2832b71f5e85f1cd4447e7e3f34ee6a uxterm > > Thanks for following up. I'm sorry to hear the bug is still present. > > FYI, the MD5 checksum of uxterm is not all that useful for the type of bug > you're reporting, as it's just a shell script wrapper around the xterm ELF > executable. > > I generally take people's word for it if they tell me they're running a > given version of a package. :)
I can't conveniently install that version of the package; perhaps my test was inadvertently invalid. I've just returned from a holiday and don't remember what I did. I'll re-test when I'm a bit more caught up. -- - mdz
