On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 08:32:58AM -0400, Ari Pollak wrote: > >Ari, > > > >Thanks for your assistance with this bug; please see my follow-up to the > >sumbitter. > > > >Your first suggestion was wrong -- I don't know of a single case where just > >"ISO-8859" is accepted -- but your parenthetical was fine. [...] > Yeah, note my followup to the bug where I corrected my typo - > he_IL.ISO-8859-8 will work fine. I'm also not really sure what you meant > by adding an alias to the glibc-style spelling of the character set, > since it's already there: > > /usr/share/i18n/SUPPORTED:he_IL ISO-8859-8
That's not an alias, that just defines which character set is used by "he_IL" for glibc. The alias I was referring to was for X11. It needs to be told that "he_IL.ISO-8859-8" means "he_IL". Hence my reference (snipped) to /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/locale.alias. -- G. Branden Robinson | I must confess to being surprised Debian GNU/Linux | by the magnitude of incompatibility [EMAIL PROTECTED] | with such a minor version bump. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Manoj Srivastava
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
