Your message dated Thu, 29 Jul 2004 02:26:42 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#261854: xlibs: some softlinks not made correctly,
installer fails to upgrade
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jul 2004 16:02:17 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 28 09:02:17 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from lakermmtao07.cox.net [68.230.240.32]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bpqsj-0001q2-00; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:02:17 -0700
Received: from hend.net ([68.100.246.2]) by lakermmtao07.cox.net
(InterMail vM.6.01.03.02.01 201-2131-111-104-103-20040709)
with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:01:41 -0400
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by hend.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i6SG1c4W011734;
Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:01:38 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "John D. Hendrickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xlibs: some softlinks not made correctly, installer fails to upgrade
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:01:38 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: xlibs
Version: 4.1.0-16
Severity: important
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux link 2.4.20-mm #1 Tue Feb 24 17:47:00 EST 2004 i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages xlibs depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.5-11.2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libfreetype6 2.0.9-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii xfree86-common 4.1.0-16 X Window System (XFree86) infrastr
ii xlibs 4.1.0-16 X Window System client libraries
Hi,
Two things. One, xlibs did not install files correctly. Two, all X packages
now require a new directory structure (which I hate). Anyway the installer
does nothing to provide this new directory structure. I made a script which
does this which has done this for me on several machines.
Just did a "dist-upgrade" to sarge
for libs I had xlib's /usr/lib/libXft.so and a couple others in /usr/lib
These are xlibs, not usr libs, they shouldn't even have links into /usr/lib
After remaking the links the installer goofed, it worked. Somehow the
installer doesn't take into account the present / previous state when making
its links.
I found the ONLY reason libXft need to be in /usr/lib is due to gtk. While
all else of gnome correctly uses X11R6/lib, gtk uses /usr/lib, oddly. Fix
that and you fix allot of confusion. The ./configure for gtk is just flat
wrong. And using ./configure --prefix=PATH won't help - becuase it is really
wrong - a goof up.
Thanks,
John D. Hendrickson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------
#!/bin/sh
# run this script before installing any of the new X packages requiring the
# new directory structure
# (if run afterward it merges files into new home in /etc/X11
# while user's files likely prevail, that just depends)
cd /etc/X11
x="/usr/X11R6/lib/X11"
xb="/usr/X11/lib/X11"
xx="/etc/X11"
cd $xx/
mkdir -p $x
mkdir -p $xx
# pivot into new place - carefully so nothing gets clobbered or missed
for z in mwm fvwm fvwm95 xkb app-defaults fs lbxproxy proxymngr rstart twm xdm
xinit xkb xserver xsm ; do
echo -ne "$z in /etc/X11 ?"
if [ -L "$z" ] ; then
echo "pivoted"
rm "$xx/$z"
mv "$x/$z/" "$xx/"
ln -s "$xx/$z" "$x"
fi
if [ ! -L "$x/$z" ] ; then
echo " and copied"
if cp -ar "$x/$z/" "$xx/$z/" ; then
rm -r "$x/$z/"
ln -s "$xx/$z" "$x"
fi
fi
if [ -L "$x/$z" ] ; then
rm "$x/$z"
ln -s "$xx/$z" "$x"
fi
echo ""
done
# fix out of date soft links
cd $xx/
for z in /etc/X11/* ; do
if [ -L "$z" ] ; then
X="$(dirname "$(find $z -type l -printf "%l")")"
echo -ne "$z on to old X11 ? ..."
if [ c"$X" == c"$xb" ] ; then
echo "rewrite ln"
rm "$z"
ln -s "$x/$(basename $z)" .
fi
echo ""
fi
done
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 261854-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jul 2004 16:26:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 28 09:26:42 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fooishbar.org (tycho.fooishbar.org) [131.252.208.81] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BprGM-0007U9-00; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:26:42 -0700
Received: by tycho.fooishbar.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id ADB28E9C036; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 09:26:42 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 02:26:42 +1000
From: Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "John D. Hendrickson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#261854: xlibs: some softlinks not made correctly, installer
fails to upgrade
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pN9MePJoZbRKbUk1"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-GnuPG-Key: 3CED7EFD
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--pN9MePJoZbRKbUk1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 12:01:38PM -0400, John D. Hendrickson wrote:
> Two things. One, xlibs did not install files correctly. Two, all X pack=
ages
> now require a new directory structure (which I hate). Anyway the install=
er
> does nothing to provide this new directory structure. I made a script wh=
ich
> does this which has done this for me on several machines.
>=20
> Just did a "dist-upgrade" to sarge
>=20
> for libs I had xlib's /usr/lib/libXft.so and a couple others in /usr/lib
>=20
> These are xlibs, not usr libs, they shouldn't even have links into /usr/l=
ib
>=20
> After remaking the links the installer goofed, it worked. Somehow the
> installer doesn't take into account the present / previous state when mak=
ing
> its links.
>=20
> I found the ONLY reason libXft need to be in /usr/lib is due to gtk. Whi=
le
> all else of gnome correctly uses X11R6/lib, gtk uses /usr/lib, oddly. Fix
> that and you fix allot of confusion. The ./configure for gtk is just flat
> wrong. And using ./configure --prefix=3DPATH won't help - becuase it is =
really
> wrong - a goof up.
/usr/X11R6 is being moved away from by upstream and everyone else sane
because it's beyond a joke nowadays. Many things -- not just Xft;
fontconfig, Xcursor, Xrender, et al -- are in /usr/lib now. You haven't
been near specific enough. What failed? What 'goofed'? Which installer
were you using? Did you do a complete dist-upgrade? If so, why is your
xlibs package still at 4.1.0-16, which is the woody version?
Closing this bug report as utterly bogus and invalid unless submitter
provides a compelling rationale otherwise.
--=20
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=2Eorg>
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debia=
n.org
--pN9MePJoZbRKbUk1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBB9PCcPClnTztfv0RAqVkAJ4gsiSS9/Nydu/IUr4myg538ZFa7wCfdbtv
IQwkPEbv7/3W9E2FB0mwD9s=
=1jQH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--pN9MePJoZbRKbUk1--
