On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 08:04:06PM -0000, Thomas Dickey wrote: > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Also, upstream ctlseqs.ms is in xc/programs/xterm, so if/when we split > > xterm off from the monolithic X SI package, XTerm (Thomas Dickey) is going > > to be our upstream for that document. > > Actually it lives in xc/doc/specs/xterm
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 11:23:31PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: > The documents removed from xterm.doc are generated in doc/specs as pointed > already. > > I had to take a decision. either kill the duplicate in xterm or build > doc/specs to produce something that is already in another package. > (and killing small bits of the reason for the existance of this branch) > > Even if i fully understand your point, that documentation still belongs to > the specs package. Otherwise we should start moving each spec file to the > package it belongs to and be coherent all over the place. > > In a future when xterm and other bits and pieces will fall into their own > packages we will see what to do. You guys convinced me. :) I told Fabio on IRC several hours ago that I withdrew my objection. I'm saying it here for the record. :) -- G. Branden Robinson | The key to being a Southern Debian GNU/Linux | Baptist: It ain't a sin if you [EMAIL PROTECTED] | don't get caught. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Anthony Davidson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
