On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 06:05:41AM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Repository Admin > wrote: > > Stop shipping duplicate doc/specs in xterm.doc. > > Fabio, > > Please revert that part of the commit before merging it onto the trunk (or > convince me you're right :) ).
> If not sure shipping (non-overlapping) duplicates is harmful in this > case, but if you disagree, xterm is a more appropriate package for > ctlseqs.ms and the files generated from it than xspecs is. > > This is because I think people are going to look for the document > describing the control sequences supported by XTerm in > /usr/share/doc/xterm before they look in /usr/share/doc/xspecs. The documents removed from xterm.doc are generated in doc/specs as pointed already. I had to take a decision. either kill the duplicate in xterm or build doc/specs to produce something that is already in another package. (and killing small bits of the reason for the existance of this branch) Even if i fully understand your point, that documentation still belongs to the specs package. Otherwise we should start moving each spec file to the package it belongs to and be coherent all over the place. In a future when xterm and other bits and pieces will fall into their own packages we will see what to do. Fabio -- <user> fajita: step one <fajita> Whatever the problem, step one is always to look in the error log. <user> fajita: step two <fajita> When in danger or in doubt, step two is to scream and shout.
