Your message dated Mon, 12 Jul 2004 22:55:44 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#256855: No option for Radeon cards
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jun 2004 14:21:37 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 29 07:21:37 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from defout.telus.net (priv-edtnes84.telusplanet.net)
[199.185.220.240]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BfJUP-0003qP-00; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 07:21:37 -0700
Received: from d154-20-73-79.bchsia.telus.net ([154.20.73.79])
by priv-edtnes84.telusplanet.net
(InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:21:06 -0600
Subject: No option for Radeon cards
From: David Meggy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 07:18:56 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4
Hi, I just tried the new debian installer (labelled June 25th on the ftp
site). When I tried to setup X windows, I was given a choice of video
cards. Radeon was not in the list. Ati was but that did not work. So
I chose ati, and then edited by hand /etc/X11/XF86Config-4, to switch
ati with Radeon. Also the video timings for my monitor were incorrectly
guessed, but I don't think I can blame the xfree86 for this since it was
using the wrong driver.
I have a Radeon 9200SE, running Debian Sarge on an AMD XP 1800+
David
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 256855-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jul 2004 03:55:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 12 20:55:45 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dhcp065-026-182-085.indy.rr.com (localhost) [65.26.182.85]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BkEOP-0003KA-00; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 20:55:45 -0700
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 7D75168C098; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 22:55:44 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 22:55:44 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#256855: No option for Radeon cards
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="glNuw4S6NeIZr5j7"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-No-CC: I subscribe to this list; do not CC me on replies.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--glNuw4S6NeIZr5j7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 07:21:19AM -0700, David Meggy wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-07-09 at 07:14, Michel D=E4nzer wrote:
> > Ideally, please provide one log of a failure with 'ati' and another of a
> > successful startup with 'radeon'.
>=20
> Now I feel dumb. I can't get it to fail anymore. Something must have
> changed between the sarge of now, and the sarge of the debian
> installer. If the logs are still useful I have the old logs.
That's okay. Don't sweat it.
Closing this report as unreproducible per submitter.
--=20
G. Branden Robinson | I had thought very carefully about
Debian GNU/Linux | committing hara-kiri over this, but
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | I overslept this morning.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Toshio Yamaguchi
--glNuw4S6NeIZr5j7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkDzXUAACgkQ6kxmHytGonyyxQCgml7CscOwdVDmJgq4w2JXrBll
gZ8AoKUFQkUCWzzraHNVmb7RYTOzVKi7
=Q51D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--glNuw4S6NeIZr5j7--
