On Thu, 2004-07-08 at 18:35 -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 06:14:15PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 00:52 +1000, Daniel Stone wrote: > > > > > > If 'ati' doesn't work, then 'radeon' has no business working. > > > > That's the theory, but the ati wrapper requires code of its own to > > support the same chips as radeon does. Maybe that was missed for a patch > > which adds support for newer Radeon chips. Been there, got bitten by > > that. :\ > > Do we know that that's actually the case here?
We'd have to see server logs to be sure, but I can't think of another reason why 'radeon' would work but not 'ati'. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | Debian (powerpc), X and DRI developer Libre software enthusiast | http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer
