On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 01:26:06AM +0200, Elrond wrote: > On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 01:51:57AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > [I don't know that Joey Hess really needs to be CCed on this, so I have > > Some year ago or so, the submitter of a bug didn't get mail > for [EMAIL PROTECTED], [...]
That was true and remains true. I did not and do not see what relevant our discussion has to him. People talk about implementing new debhelper features all the time; he'd probably become more interested once you have a working design or prototype. > > I think if you had actually read the file, this would have been clear to > > you. > > Well, "but you know better, I presume" was intended to say: > "Let's stop this discussion here, I'm 99% sure, you know, > what you're doing there." ;) You could go to the trouble of reading the xfree86 package's debian/copyright file just once for yourself. > Well, I wanted to explain, what the idea _was_. > > Anyway, I think, we should stop this discussion here and > hope for Joey to say anything. > > (I don't see a point in coding debhelper stuff like mad for > realising at the end, that Joey has much better plans.) You could ask him, but I am not sure this bug report is the best place to do so. -- G. Branden Robinson | The best place to hide something is Debian GNU/Linux | in documentation. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Ethan Benson http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
