Your message dated Mon, 3 May 2004 12:55:27 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#246760: xserver-xfree86: cannot upgrade from 4.1.0-2 - 
complaint about unknown 'escription-pt_br'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Apr 2004 21:54:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 30 14:54:18 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.85] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BJfxZ-0002HO-00; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 14:54:17 -0700
Received: from black-sun.demon.co.uk ([212.228.147.62] helo=nova)
        by anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
        id 1BJfxU-000GlS-0Z
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 22:54:12 +0100
Received: from paul 
        by nova with local id 1BJfxR-0005qG-4C
        ; Fri, 30 Apr 2004 22:54:09 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Paul Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xserver-xfree86: cannot upgrade from 4.1.0-2 - complaint about unknown
 'escription-pt_br'
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.58
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 22:54:08 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.1.0-2
Severity: normal
Tags: sid

When I try to upgrade from xserver-xfree86 4.1.0-2, I get the following
complaint from dpkg:

Preparing to replace xserver-xfree86 4.1.0-2 (using 
.../xserver-xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-1_i386.deb) ...
ln: /etc/X11/X.dpkg-old': File exists
dpkg: error processing 
/var/cache/apt/archives/xserver-xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-1_i386.deb (--unpack):
 subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
debconf: Unknown template field 'escription-pt_br', in stanza #28 of
/var/lib/dpkg/info/xserver-xfree86.templates

Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/xserver-xfree86_4.3.0.dfsg.1-1_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

(I'm pretty sure that the 'X.dpkg-old' part isn't the problem, but I've
included it for completeness.)

I've looked through the file it references, and I can't find a field by that
description. The bug might be with dpkg, I guess, but this is the first and
only time I've ever seen it (dpkg upgraded lots of other packages fine at
the same time).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (600, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.24
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages xserver-xfree86 depends on:
ii  debconf                     1.4.24       Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-10 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  xserver-common              4.3.0-7      files and utilities common to all 
ii  zlib1g                      1:1.2.1-3    compression library - runtime

-- debconf information excluded

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 246760-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 May 2004 17:55:29 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 03 10:55:29 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dhcp065-026-182-085.indy.rr.com (redwald.deadbeast.net) 
[65.26.182.85] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1BKhf7-0005V2-00; Mon, 03 May 2004 10:55:29 -0700
Received: by redwald.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id D89D464129; Mon,  3 May 2004 12:55:27 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 12:55:27 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#246760: xserver-xfree86: cannot upgrade from 4.1.0-2 - 
complaint about unknown 'escription-pt_br'
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="z6Eq5LdranGa6ru8"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-No-CC: I subscribe to this list; do not CC me on replies.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
        VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2


--z6Eq5LdranGa6ru8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

tag 246760 + unreproducible
thanks

On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 12:41:22AM +0100, Paul Walker wrote:
> On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 01:28:05AM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
>=20
> > > No idea whether the corruption came from 4.1.0 or 4.3.0, I'm afraid.
> > Very strange, this file is not the one found on Debian servers.
> > Where does it come from?
>=20
> Er .. if it's not from either of those packages, then I've no idea! This =
is
> the first time I've touched any of the files in the dpkg directories. If
> it's definitely not present in 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1, then the bug might as well=
 be
> closed, I guess.

It's certainly not present in 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 on my machines.

Closing as unreproducible.

--=20
G. Branden Robinson                |      "There is no gravity in space."
Debian GNU/Linux                   |      "Then how could astronauts walk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                 |       around on the Moon?"
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |      "Because they wore heavy boots."

--z6Eq5LdranGa6ru8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkCWh48ACgkQ6kxmHytGonyN4gCgqGwmGilJc0BqBzfsHstFkpHB
zxkAn1CIzRwlQ1mHpl24fkOqlofZq1d4
=/cTp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--z6Eq5LdranGa6ru8--

Reply via email to