On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 02:19:01PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 11:27, Helge Hafting wrote: > > Branden Robinson wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 01:28:00PM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote: > > > > > >>Branden Robinson wrote: > > > > Core was generated by `/usr/bin/X11/X -dpi 100 -nolisten tcp'. > > Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted. > > [...] > > > Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?) > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > Indeed, the backtrace looks rather bogus to me.
Yeah, looks like a smashed stack. Since the X server runs setuid root, does this mean we've just found a security vulnerability? -- G. Branden Robinson | You could wire up a dead rat to a Debian GNU/Linux | DIMM socket and the PC BIOS memory [EMAIL PROTECTED] | test would pass it just fine. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Ethan Benson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
