On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 02:48:39PM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 13:41, Branden Robinson wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 03:47:54PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > > > > > > * In xfree86.cf, DefaultGcc2i386Opt, DefaultGcc2AxpOpt, and > > > DefaultGcc2PpcOpt > > > are defined to contain GccAliasingArgs. But in linux.cf, they're defined > > > to > > > *not* contain it. > > > > > > Note that GccAliasingArgs was introduced upstream sometime after 4.2. > > > How > > > precisely should it be handled for Debian? > > > > Good question. I'd like to solicit suggestions from the mailing list. > > :) > > > > If the XFree86 codebase is strict-aliasing safe, we can do without > > -fno-strict-aliasing. > > It traditionally wasn't, and I haven't seen anything to suggest that > this has been fixed.
Okay. We should definitely ensure that every arch uses GccAliasingArgs, then. -- G. Branden Robinson | Debian GNU/Linux | Please do not look directly into [EMAIL PROTECTED] | laser with remaining eye. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
