Your message dated Sun, 16 Nov 2003 23:55:14 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#220982: changelog.Debian.gz: wish paths mentioned had some
relevance from users point of view
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 2003 01:17:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 15 19:17:12 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from frodo.hserus.net [204.74.68.40]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ALBXL-0000UM-00; Sat, 15 Nov 2003 19:17:12 -0600
Received: from tc218-187-76-101.2-4.pl.apol.com.tw ([218.187.76.101]:34201
helo=jidanni.org)
by frodo.hserus.net with asmtp
(Cipher TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.24 #4)
id 1ALBXK-000LW9-58 by authid <jidanni> with plain
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 06:47:10 +0530
Received: from jidanni by jidanni.org with local (Exim 4.24)
id 1ALAj7-00018H-DE; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 08:25:17 +0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: changelog.Debian.gz: wish paths mentioned had some relevance from users
point of view
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.34
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 08:25:17 +0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: xdm
Version: 4.2.1-13
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/share/doc/xdm/changelog.Debian.gz
Probably not that simple, but if possible, I wish the references to
files in /usr/share/doc/xdm/changelog.Debian.gz were written from the
user's point of view, as it takes a lot of sleuthing to figure out
what files you are talking about.
$ dlocate debian/local/FAQ
$ dlocate FAQ
$ dlocate FAQ|grep -i x
$ dlocate FAQ|grep -i x/
$ dlocate FAQ|grep -i /x
OK, no big deal.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 220982-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Nov 2003 04:55:16 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 16 22:55:15 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dhcp065-026-182-085.indy.rr.com (redwald.deadbeast.net)
[65.26.182.85]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ALbPv-0007fO-00; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 22:55:15 -0600
Received: by redwald.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 919406427E; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 23:55:14 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 23:55:14 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#220982: changelog.Debian.gz: wish paths mentioned had some
relevance from users point of view
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="X+nYw8KZ/oNxZ8JS"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=4.0
tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--X+nYw8KZ/oNxZ8JS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 08:25:17AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Package: xdm
> Version: 4.2.1-13
> Severity: wishlist
> File: /usr/share/doc/xdm/changelog.Debian.gz
>=20
> Probably not that simple, but if possible, I wish the references to
> files in /usr/share/doc/xdm/changelog.Debian.gz were written from the
> user's point of view, as it takes a lot of sleuthing to figure out
> what files you are talking about.
> $ dlocate debian/local/FAQ
> $ dlocate FAQ
> $ dlocate FAQ|grep -i x
> $ dlocate FAQ|grep -i x/
> $ dlocate FAQ|grep -i /x
> OK, no big deal.
The changelog is there primarily for communication with other
developers, not with the user.
NEWS.Debian, README.Debian, and other such files are generally targeted
at the user.
Closing this request as ill-considered.
--=20
G. Branden Robinson | Men use thought only to justify
Debian GNU/Linux | their wrong doings, and speech only
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | to conceal their thoughts.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Voltaire
--X+nYw8KZ/oNxZ8JS
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAj+4VLIACgkQ6kxmHytGonyoNQCgmV+5Q1rhlYKwfUZzNhcy2N3T
GjQAoKbnGReAPIWSrvkkyGQahKxyN4AP
=LpMZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--X+nYw8KZ/oNxZ8JS--
