On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 19:21, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 04:53:52PM +0100, James Troup wrote: > > X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Author: branden > > > Date: 2003-06-04 10:08:27 -0500 (Wed, 04 Jun 2003) > > > New Revision: 139 > > > > > > Modified: > > > trunk/debian/changelog > > > trunk/debian/rules > > > Log: > > > step compile optimization level down to -O from Policy-required -O2 for > > > arm > > > architecture as well as powerpc, due to GCC 3.3 issues (see Debian bug > > > #195424) > > > > If you're going to work around the ICEs, maybe it'd be better to > > up(/down)grade the compiler that's used to gcc-3.2 rather than > > reducing the optimization? I'm not particularly bothered mind, it's > > just a thought... > > Well, I considered that but decided against it. I'd like to believe > that gcc 3.3 will fix its regressions and I can just yank this patch, > which seems less disruptive to me than hacking up debian/control to B-D > on gcc-3.2 and B-C gcc-3.3, which would also keep xlibmesa-glu from > being built against libstdc+5-3.3.
Let me point out once again that there's an easy way to get rid of all problems related to xlibmesa-glu... -- Earthling Michel Dänzer \ Debian (powerpc), XFree86 and DRI developer Software libre enthusiast \ http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=daenzer
