On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 04:53:52PM +0100, James Troup wrote: > X Strike Force SVN Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Author: branden > > Date: 2003-06-04 10:08:27 -0500 (Wed, 04 Jun 2003) > > New Revision: 139 > > > > Modified: > > trunk/debian/changelog > > trunk/debian/rules > > Log: > > step compile optimization level down to -O from Policy-required -O2 for arm > > architecture as well as powerpc, due to GCC 3.3 issues (see Debian bug > > #195424) > > If you're going to work around the ICEs, maybe it'd be better to > up(/down)grade the compiler that's used to gcc-3.2 rather than > reducing the optimization? I'm not particularly bothered mind, it's > just a thought...
Well, I considered that but decided against it. I'd like to believe that gcc 3.3 will fix its regressions and I can just yank this patch, which seems less disruptive to me than hacking up debian/control to B-D on gcc-3.2 and B-C gcc-3.3, which would also keep xlibmesa-glu from being built against libstdc+5-3.3. Maybe if comments were supported in debian/control files I'd feel differently. :) Honestly, it seems to me pretty close to "six of one, half-a-dozen of another". I picked this approach in full awareness of the alternative. I'm willing to listen to arguments for change, though. -- G. Branden Robinson | Debian GNU/Linux | Cogitationis poenam nemo meretur. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
pgpuWGljFEsyq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
