On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 10:29:22PM -0500, X Strike Force SVN Admin wrote: > Author: daniel > Date: 2003-05-27 22:29:06 -0500 (Tue, 27 May 2003) > New Revision: 82 > > Modified: > branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/rules > branches/4.3.0/sid/debian/scripts/vars.s390 > Log: > Move DRM stuff to be in !NOT_BUILDING_XF86_SERVER, not !NOT_BUILDING_X_SERVER, > and declare that s390 builds no servers whatsoever, not just not building the > xf86 server, hopefully fixing s390 FTBFS.
That's a regression, then:
xnest | 4.2.1-6 | unstable | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k,
mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
xprt | 4.2.1-6 | unstable | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k,
mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
xvfb | 4.2.1-6 | unstable | alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k,
mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
This should be investigated. s390 should be able to build xnest, xvfb,
and xprt. Losing xvfb will kill some Tk and Python-related stuff that
absolutely insists on having a live X server just to build.
--
G. Branden Robinson |
Debian GNU/Linux | If encryption is outlawed, only
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | outlaws will @goH7Ok=<q4fDj]Kz?.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
pgpa44PnpK7OJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
