On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 10:42:46AM -0500, Branden Robinson scrawled: > On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 09:33:13PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > This patch is, FWIW, unnecessary for my packages: a different fix (with > > the same effect, however), was applied upstream, sometime before > > 4.2.99.4. > > Where? Not to the file in question (xc/lib/X11/XlcDL.c) according to > upstream CVS.
Well, if this is contradictory to my assertions, please let me know: #ifdef _LP64 # if defined(__sparcv9) # define _MACH64_NAME "sparcv9" # elif defined(__ia64__) # undef MACH64_NAME # else # error "Unknown architecture" # endif /* defined(__sparcv9) */ # ifdef _MACH64_NAME # define _MACH64_NAME_LEN (sizeof (_MACH64_NAME) - 1) # endif #endif /* _LP64 */ [...] #if defined(_LP64) && defined(_MACH64_NAME) [sparcv9-only code] #else [code for the rest of us peons] #endif _LP64 is not mentioned further in the file. Unless I'm fundamentally understanding the #if/#elif statements, that code will *not* run on anything but "sparcv9". Unless, of course, IA64 defines __sparcv9. > Do you know? I'd hazard a guess at "yes", myself. -- Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
pgpX5Ea4v3TIV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
