Okeley... shall I rebuild the current ones to be 4.1.0-0potato9, or can I wait for 4.1.0potato10?
Thanks, Charl On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 12:06:08PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 10:36:20AM -0600, Scott Dier wrote: > > * Charl P. Botha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011108 16:35]: > > > UNOFFICIAL builds of Branden's official XFree86 4.1.0-9 debs are > > > available. > > > See http://people.debian.org/~cpbotha/xf410_potato/READ.THIS > > > > Is there a reason these shouldn't be versioned 9potato1 so if someone > > uses a automated bug tool that branden can kill bugs with this version? > > Actually they should probably be numbered 4.1.0-0potato9 so that all > woody versions compare higher than all potato versions. -- charl p. botha | computer graphics and cad/cam http://cpbotha.net/ | http://www.cg.its.tudelft.nl/
