Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> (2024-12-16): > On 16/12/2024 10:51, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> (2024-12-07): > > > This was addressed a few weeks back (through libx11 2:1.8.10-2) but > > > there were no requests to binNMU packages to fix dependencies. > > > > > > The following 8 binary packages are broken on arm64 exclusively (which > > > presumably had its own thing going at the right moment): > > > > > > libxfixes3-udeb > > > libxft2-udeb > > > libxinerama1-udeb > > > libxkbfile1-udeb > > > libxrandr2-udeb > > > libxrender1-udeb > > > libxtst6-udeb > > > matchbox-keyboard-udeb > > > > > > which translates to those source packages (modulo xft's position): > > > > > > libxfixes > > > libxinerama > > > libxkbfile > > > libxrandr > > > libxrender > > > libxtst > > > matchbox-keyboard > > > xft > > > > > > I'll let you decide whether you prefer binNMU on all architectures or > > > just arm64. > > > > Ping? We are still unable to build d-i on arm64… > > Sorry for the delay. binNMUs scheduled.
Thanks. Looks like everything is in the right state, dose reports are similar between e.g. amd64 and arm64, and the daily build for arm64 just completed successfully. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
