Hi, Cyril Brulebois <k...@debian.org> (2024-11-04): > Package: libx11-6 > Version: 2:1.8.10-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: d-i > Justification: broken shlibs, breaks udebs, etc. > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-b...@lists.debian.org > > [ Now turning the initial mail ping into a proper bug report. ] > > Spotted via dose's reporting lots of uninstallable udebs on arm64: the > new shlibs for libx11-6 is broken, with various libx* packages now > depending on libx11-xcb1 (not a udeb). > > https://d-i.debian.org/dose/graph-unstable-arm64.png
This was addressed a few weeks back (through libx11 2:1.8.10-2) but
there were no requests to binNMU packages to fix dependencies.
The following 8 binary packages are broken on arm64 exclusively (which
presumably had its own thing going at the right moment):
libxfixes3-udeb
libxft2-udeb
libxinerama1-udeb
libxkbfile1-udeb
libxrandr2-udeb
libxrender1-udeb
libxtst6-udeb
matchbox-keyboard-udeb
which translates to those source packages (modulo xft's position):
libxfixes
libxinerama
libxkbfile
libxrandr
libxrender
libxtst
matchbox-keyboard
xft
I'll let you decide whether you prefer binNMU on all architectures or
just arm64.
Thanks already.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
