Aaron, try installing xutils per the recommendation in xfonts-75dpi.
----- Forwarded message from Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 16:06:10 -0700
Resent-Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 16:01:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 18:03:56 -0500
To: debian-x@lists.debian.org
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: fonts packages]
Mail-Followup-To: debian-x@lists.debian.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Branden Robinson)
Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-From: debian-x@lists.debian.org
X-Mailing-List: <debian-x@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/1231
X-Loop: debian-x@lists.debian.org
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Bcc:
Sounds like a FAQ and/or some outdated 4.0 test packages. libXfont is not
built shared, and hasn't been for a while.
----- Forwarded message from Aaron Brick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
From: Aaron Brick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fonts packages
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 15:16:31 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i
hi branden,
are the woody xfonts-* known to be broken? i'm having trouble with a lack of
mkfontdir and libXfont, and dpkg complaining a lot. please let me know if i
should a) go away, b) submit more information, or c) downgrade.
thanks!
aaron.
- | | | | | | | | | | -
- -
- -
- aaron brick -
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
- -
- -
- | | | | | | | | | | -
----- End forwarded message -----
--
G. Branden Robinson | A celibate clergy is an especially good
Debian GNU/Linux | idea, because it tends to suppress any
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | hereditary propensity toward fanaticism.
http://deadbeast.net/~branden/ | -- Carl Sagan
----- End forwarded message -----
--
``Oh Lord; Ooh you are so big; So absolutely huge; Gosh we're all really
impressed down here, I can tell you.''
