On Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 10:43:00PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > xlibgl1's shlibs says: > > libGL 1 xlibgl1 (>= 4.0.1-0) > libOSMesa 3 xlibgl1 (>= 4.0.1-0) > > is there a reason for that? (ignore the libOSMesa line -- it's there > for completeness) It should be simply libgl1. If a program /really/ > depends on the OpenGL implementation in Xfree86 4.0, it's either > broken or has a very specific need. In the later case, it should > declare the dependency by itself.
I just tossed that in because I needed a shlibs line. What, specifically, do you suggest, again? Please show me the exact format so I don't screw it up. :) Also, I'm starting to think I need to pull libOSMesa into its own package, because the virtual package libgl1 can only be expected to provide libGL, not libGLU, libOSMesa, or anything else. -- G. Branden Robinson | It's not a matter of alienating authors. Debian GNU/Linux | They have every right to license their [EMAIL PROTECTED] | software however we like. http://www.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Craig Sanders, in debian-devel
pgpdcjwXp4eBG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
